Question

What are the advantages and disadvantages of the P6 LED display compared to models such as P4 and P8?

Answer 1

Below is a comparison of P6 LED displays with common pixel pitch models such as P4 and P8 (focusing on advantages and disadvantages) to help you choose the most suitable product for your application scenario.

I. Basic Concepts Review

P4: 4mm pixel pitch, denser pixel pitch, finer display

P6: 6mm pixel pitch, medium pixel density

P8: 8mm pixel pitch, larger pixel pitch, less fine display than the previous two

Smaller pixel pitch → higher display sharpness, suitable for close-range viewing; larger pixel pitch → more suitable for longer viewing distances, lower cost.

II. Advantages and Disadvantages of P6 Compared to P4

✅ Advantages (Compared to P4)

More economical / Lower cost

Fewer pixels → lower module cost and overall screen cost.

Relatively lower installation and maintenance costs.

More suitable for medium viewing distances

Typically suitable for viewing environments of around 10–20 meters (depending on specific size and brightness).

Lower System Resource Requirements

Driver card, processor, and bandwidth requirements are lower than high-density screens.

Lower Power Consumption

Reduced number of LEDs and controllers → Lower power consumption.

❌ Disadvantages (Compared to P4)

Insufficient Image Detail

Detail and text clarity are inferior to P4.

Poor Close-Range Viewing Experience

If the viewing distance is within 5–8 meters, the image graininess is noticeable.

Unsuitable for Displaying High-Precision Content

For content requiring very fine detail, such as images, text, and charts.

III. Advantages and Disadvantages of P6 Compared to P8

✅ Advantages (Compared to P8)

Higher Display Clarity

Denseer pixels → Sharper image and richer detail.

Suitable for Closer Viewing Distances

The viewing experience is significantly better than P8 within approximately 8–15 meters.

Better User Experience

Improved image quality → Better display of advertisements and videos.

❌ Disadvantages (Compared to P8)

Higher manufacturing cost

More pixels → Increased cost.

Higher energy consumption

More LEDs → Increased power consumption.

Higher requirements for the drive system

Data processing and refresh requirements are higher than P8.

IV. Typical Application Scenarios

P4: Close-range (≤8–12 m), reception areas, meeting rooms, high-end indoor advertising, showrooms

P6: Medium-range (≈10–20 m), medium-sized indoor venues, restaurants, shopping mall mid-section screens, outdoor advertising

P8: Long-range (≥15 m), building facades, large outdoor screens, long-distance viewing at transportation hubs

V. Summary and Comparison

P4

Clarity: ⭐⭐⭐⭐

Closest viewing distance: ≤8m

Cost: High

Power consumption: High

Long-distance readability: Average

P6

Clarity: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

Closest viewing distance: ~8m

Cost: Medium

Power consumption: Medium

Long-distance readability: Good

P8

Clarity: ⭐⭐

Closest viewing distance: >12m

Cost: Low

Power consumption: Low

Long-distance readability: Excellent

VI. Selection

✅ Limited budget & primarily for long-distance viewing → P8 is more suitable

✅ For those seeking a balance between image quality and cost, the P6 is the optimal compromise.

✅ For those with high demands for high-definition image quality at close range, the P4 or a smaller pixel pitch is the best choice.

Answer 2

Compared to P4 and P8 models, the advantages and disadvantages of the P6 LED display are as follows:

I. Core Advantages

High Cost-Effectiveness: The P6 uses SMD 3535 LED chips, offering high brightness with good cost control, suitable for scenarios requiring high brightness despite a limited budget.

Larger Size and High Brightness: Compared to the P4, the P6 has larger pixels (6mm), supporting larger screen sizes and higher brightness, making it suitable for outdoor or bright light environments.

Stability and Mature Technology: The front-emitting LED chip technology has been market-proven, ensuring stable quality; the thicker PCB board improves transparency and reduces glare.

II. Core Disadvantages

Lower Pixel Density: The P6's 6mm pixel density is significantly lower than the P4 (4mm) and P8 (smaller), resulting in weaker detail display capabilities, making it unsuitable for scenarios requiring fine images.

Insufficient Color and Refresh Rate:

Color reproduction is lower than the P4, resulting in less realistic image quality.

The refresh rate is typically 50Hz, lower than the P4's 60Hz or higher, leading to poorer video playback smoothness.

Limited Cost Control

Although the P6 is cheaper than the P8, its cost is still higher than the P4 due to the need for more LEDs and circuitry.

III. Recommended Application Scenarios

P6: Suitable for outdoor advertising, large information screens, and other scenarios requiring high brightness but not high detail.

P4: Suitable for shopping mall billboards, conference rooms, and other scenarios requiring high definition and color reproduction.

P8: If this model exists (not explicitly stated in search results), it may further reduce pixel density and cost, but needs to be evaluated based on specific application requirements.

Summary: The P6 excels in cost-effectiveness and high brightness, but a balance between detail performance and cost must be struck based on actual needs.

Answer 3

P6, P4, and P8 are common outdoor full-color LED display models. The "P" in their names stands for pixel pitch, measured in millimeters. For example, P6 indicates a pixel pitch of 6 mm, P4 4 mm, and P8 8 mm. Pixel pitch directly affects key performance indicators such as display resolution, clarity, optimal viewing distance, and cost.

The following is a comparative analysis of the P6 with P4 and P8 models from multiple perspectives:

Advantages of P6 over P4 and P8

1. High Cost-Effectiveness

The P6 achieves a good balance between clarity and cost. Compared to the P4, it is easier to manufacture, has lower production costs, and is more competitively priced.

While the P4 offers higher resolution and more detailed image quality, its high cost limits its widespread application in large-scale outdoor scenarios.

2. Suitable for medium to long-distance viewing

The optimal viewing distance for the P6 is typically between 8 and 15 meters, making it suitable for crowded locations such as plazas, commercial streets, and transportation hubs where viewers are at a medium to long distance.

In contrast, the P4 is better suited for close-range viewing (such as exhibition halls and stage backdrops), while the P8 requires a greater distance to avoid noticeable pixelation.

3. Highly durable and adaptable to outdoor environments

The P6 outdoor LED display is designed specifically for outdoor use, featuring waterproof, dustproof, UV-resistant, and high/low temperature resistance characteristics, allowing for stable operation in harsh weather conditions such as rain, snow, and strong sunlight.

Its robust structure and relatively low maintenance costs make it suitable for long-term outdoor use.

4. Wide viewing angle and strong coverage

The P6 display boasts a horizontal viewing angle of up to 140°, maintaining good visibility even when viewed from the side, thus improving information dissemination efficiency.

5. High brightness, visible in sunlight

The outdoor P6 screen boasts high brightness (typically 5000–8000 cd/m²), ensuring clear display even in direct sunlight during the day.

Disadvantages of P6

Comparison Item | Disadvantage Explanation

Compared to P4: - Lower resolution, insufficient image detail

- Not suitable for scenarios requiring high-definition display or close-range viewing (e.g., indoor conference halls, high-end shopping mall interior walls)

Compared to P8: - Higher cost than P8

- In ultra-long-distance scenarios (e.g., highway billboards), P8's larger pixel pitch is more cost-effective.

Application Scenarios Recommendations

P4: Indoor stage backdrops, studios, conference rooms, high-end retail stores, etc., requiring high-definition close-range viewing.

P6: Mid-to-long-distance outdoor scenarios such as city squares, bus stops, commercial building exteriors, stadium perimeters, etc.

P8: Ultra-long-distance projects with limited budgets, such as highway billboards, large factory signage, and information display screens in remote areas.

Conclusion: With its moderate pixel pitch, good clarity, strong environmental adaptability, and high cost-effectiveness, the P6 LED display has become one of the mainstream choices in outdoor advertising and public information dissemination. While its resolution is not as high as the P4, nor as low-cost as the P8, it offers a balanced performance in terms of overall capabilities and practicality, making it particularly suitable for urban-level mid-range visual communication needs. Users should choose the appropriate model based on their actual installation location, viewing distance, and budget.

Answer 4

Compared to models like P4 and P8, the advantages and disadvantages of the P6 LED display screen are mainly reflected in pixel pitch, resolution, viewing distance, brightness, cost, and applicable scenarios. A detailed analysis follows:

I. Disadvantages of P6 (Compared to P4)

Pixel Pitch and Resolution: The P6 has a pixel pitch of 6mm and a pixel density of 27,777 dots/㎡; while the P4 has a pixel pitch of 4mm and a pixel density as high as 62,500 dots/㎡.

Impact: The P4 displays more detail in the same area, resulting in finer images and text, making it suitable for close-range viewing (e.g., shopping malls, exhibitions); the P6, due to its lower pixel density, exhibits more noticeable graininess when viewed at close range.

Optimal Viewing Distance: The optimal viewing distance for the P4 is approximately 10 meters, while for the P6 it is approximately 20 meters.

Impact: The P4 is more suitable for indoor or small-scale outdoor scenarios (e.g., stage backdrops), while the P6 requires a greater distance to achieve its best effect, such as in plazas and stadiums.

Cost: The P6 has a lower pixel density than the P4, making it relatively easier and cheaper to produce. However, for higher resolution, the P4 may offer better value (despite its higher unit price, the display quality is significantly improved).

II. Advantages of the P6 (Compared to the P8): Pixel Pitch and Resolution: The P6 has a smaller pixel pitch (6mm) than the P8 (8mm), and a higher pixel density (27,777 dots/㎡) than the P8 (15,625 dots/㎡).

Impact: The P6 displays richer content in the same area, making it suitable for medium-distance viewing (e.g., within 20 meters), while the P8 requires a greater distance (e.g., over 30 meters) to avoid pixelation.

Viewing Distance Adaptability: The P6 offers greater flexibility in viewing distance (10-20 meters), covering short to medium distance scenarios; the P8 is more suitable for long distances (e.g., highway billboards, large outdoor events). Brightness and Energy Efficiency Balance

The brightness of the P6 is typically between 5000-7000 cd/㎡, higher than the P4 (above 4000 cd/㎡), but lower than some high-brightness P8 models.

Impact: The P6 performs more stably under strong outdoor light, while consuming less energy than the P8 (due to lower pixel density and reduced drive requirements).

Cost and Maintenance

The P6 has a lower cost per unit area than the P4, and due to its moderate pixel density, its failure rate (such as lamp drop-off or lamp failure) and subsequent maintenance costs are lower than the P8 (the P8, due to its larger pixel pitch and higher power per LED, may require more frequent maintenance over long-term use).

III. Comprehensive Applicable Scenarios for the P6

Advantageous Scenarios:

Mid-distance outdoor advertising: Such as squares, commercial streets, stadiums, etc., with viewing distances between 15-30 meters, the P6 offers the best balance between clarity and cost.

Government/Corporate advertising: In situations where display effect and budget must be considered, the P6 offers better value for money than the P4 and is more detailed than the P8.

Information Display at Transportation Hubs: For locations like train stations and docks, information such as train numbers and times needs to be clearly displayed at medium distances.

Disadvantageous Scenarios: Very close-up viewing (e.g., indoor stages, exhibitions): P4 offers superior detail.

Very long-distance broadcasting (e.g., highway billboards): P8's pixel pitch and brightness are more suitable.

IV. Summary The P4, P6, and P8 LED display models differ significantly in core parameters and applicable scenarios. A detailed comparison is as follows:

1. Pixel Pitch and Resolution

P4: 4mm pixel pitch, high resolution of 62,500 dots/㎡, extremely detailed display, suitable for close-up viewing (e.g., within 10 meters), but higher cost per unit area.

P6: 6mm pixel pitch, 27,777 dots/㎡, moderate clarity, minimal graininess at medium distances (around 20 meters), good balance between cost and effect.

P8: 8mm pixel pitch, 15,625 dots/㎡ resolution, lowest pixel density. Maintains clarity even at long distances (over 30 meters), but content appears somewhat grainy at close range.

2. Optimal Viewing Distance

P4: Suitable for scenarios within 10 meters, such as indoor stages, exhibitions, shopping malls, etc., requiring close-up viewing.

P6: Covers mid-distance scenarios of 15-30 meters, such as squares, stadiums, corporate advertising screens, balancing clarity and cost.

P8: Designed for long distances over 30 meters, such as highway billboards, large outdoor event backdrops, requiring coverage of a wide audience.

3. Brightness and Energy Efficiency

P4: Brightness typically exceeds 4000 cd/㎡, performing excellently indoors or in low-light outdoor environments, but higher brightness models may increase energy consumption.

P6: Brightness ranges from 5000-7000 cd/㎡, offering better visibility in strong outdoor light, and due to its moderate pixel density, its energy efficiency is superior to P8.

P8: Brightness can reach over 7000 cd/㎡, with outstanding resistance to ambient light interference during long-distance transmission; however, high-brightness LEDs may shorten lifespan.

4. Cost and Maintenance

P4: Highest cost per unit area, but offers exquisite display quality, suitable for scenarios with ample budgets and stringent image quality requirements.

P6: Lower cost than P4, and due to its moderate pixel density, it has a lower failure rate (e.g., LED failure, dead LEDs) and lower maintenance costs, offering excellent value.

P8: Lowest cost per unit area, but high single-lamp power, which may increase maintenance frequency with long-term use (e.g., LED replacement, heat dissipation).

5. Summary of Applicable Scenarios

Choose P4: For those requiring extreme clarity and close viewing distances (e.g., indoor stages, high-end exhibitions).

Choose P6: For those seeking a balance between clarity and cost, and viewing distances between 15-30 meters (e.g., plazas, stadiums, corporate promotions). Choose P8: If you need to cover viewers at extremely long distances (e.g., beyond 50 meters) or have a limited budget and low image quality requirements (e.g., highway billboards).

Core logic: Smaller pixel pitch results in higher resolution, suitable for close-up viewing; larger pixel pitch provides better visibility at long distances, but noticeable graininess up close. P6, through a compromise design, becomes a "cost-effective choice" for mid-range scenarios.

Answer 5

P6 LED displays are a common medium-pitch model in outdoor applications. Their advantages and disadvantages need to be compared with models such as P4 and P8.

Advantages

- High cost-effectiveness: The P6's moderate pixel pitch (6mm) strikes a good balance between display effect and cost, making it particularly suitable for medium viewing distance scenarios, such as commercial streets and billboards.

- Wide applicable viewing distance: The recommended viewing distance for P6 is 6-15 meters, and can even reach 150 meters (depending on the specific model), suitable for medium to long-distance viewing with good image integrity.

- Lower cost: Compared to small-pitch models like P4, P6 has lower manufacturing costs and prices (e.g., outdoor full-color screens cost approximately 2000-4000 RMB/square meter), while its brightness and protection performance meet outdoor requirements.

Disadvantages

- Limited Clarity: The P6's pixel pitch is larger than the P4's (4mm), resulting in a lower pixel density (27777 dots/㎡ vs. 62500 dots/㎡). This may cause graininess when viewed at close range, making it unsuitable for scenarios requiring extremely high image quality.

- Limited Applicability: In close-viewing environments (such as indoor showrooms or close-range outdoor advertising), the P6's display effect is not as refined as the P4 or smaller pixel pitch models. Compared to the P8, its cost is higher, but its advantage at long distances is not significant.

- Brightness and Maintenance: Although the P6's brightness can reach 3200 cd/㎡ (as with Raycus models), higher brightness is required in strong outdoor lighting conditions, and maintenance costs may be higher than for larger pixel pitch models like the P8.

Overall Comparison

- Compared to the P4: The P4 offers higher clarity and is suitable for close-range viewing, but it is more expensive; the P6 covers mid-range needs at a lower cost. - Compared to the P8: The P8 has a larger pixel pitch (8mm) and lower cost, making it suitable for ultra-long-distance scenarios (such as squares), but the P6 provides a more detailed display at medium distances.

When choosing, you need to weigh viewing distance, budget, and image quality requirements: The P6 has a clear advantage in medium-distance, medium-budget scenarios, but for close-range or over-budget projects, you may need to consider the P4 or P8.